According to Prince Lateef Fagbemi, SAN, the PDP interfered unfairly in the affairs of the APC and behaved as a busy body.
The Apex Court ruled that in addition to the PDP lacking the necessary jurisdiction to file the lawsuit, the party had also failed to present any proof that Shettima had used a double nomination scheme.
The PDP’s allegation of the Vice President-elect’s double nomination was called unfortunate and obviously intentional mischief intended to deceive the Court and the nation.
The Supreme Court also agreed with Fagbemi that PDP must remain an observer despite its pains regarding how the APC conducted its primary election and chose its candidates.
“It is quite obvious that the Appellant (PDP) in this
the entirety of its position in the current case is interfering in the business of another party as a busy body and intrusive outsider.
He spoke.
The court ruled that PDP’s action was painful because it set up a booby trap on social media for the Supreme Court to use as leverage to blackmail it.
It stated that this is extremely regrettable, unjustified, and uncalled for.
Details to come…
